I’m hearing multiple reports of hiring surges in agencies, such as CISA, that did RIFs last year. A RIF requires an agency to determine that there is “a surplus of employees at a particular location in a particular line of work.” 5 C.F.R. 351.201(a)(1). Every plaintiff who’s suing over a RIF should compare the functions of these new vacancy announcements to the jobs they did before they were RIFed, and for language in the announcements suggesting that hiring is politically weighted or coded. If the jobs are similar, that will be evidence that last year’s RIFs were not based on a legitimate lack of work, were improper, and that the employees should be reinstated with back pay.
Justin DoubledayJustin Doubleday • 3rd+3rd+Reporter covering the federal government | Reach out with news or tips | Signal and email are in bioReporter covering the federal government | Reach out with news or tips | Signal and email are in bio2w • 2 weeks ago • Visible to anyone on or off LinkedIn


Comments
One response
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.